Synopsis
This report shows the leading Military IT, Data and Computing market segments in various regions across the world. Details of top companies active across the global Military IT, Data and Computing market are provided, together with market size and forecast 2012-2022 for the main players across those areas.
SUMMARY
The report provides a detailed analysis of the competitive landscape of the Military IT, Data and Computing market. It provides an overview of key Military IT, Data and Computing companies catering to the Military IT, Data and Computing sector, together with insights such as key alliances, strategic initiatives and a brief financial analysis.
The global military IT, data and computing industry is highly competitive. The US and various European countries are among the leading spenders and have well-developed IT related industries, making these territories self-reliant. A need to transform the existing military into a fully network-centric force, digitalization of armed force and rapid pace of software obsolescence has driven the demand for military IT, data. and computing systems.
SCOPE
NA
REASON TO BUY
"The Global Military IT, Data and Computing Market 2012-2022 - Competitive Landscape and Strategic Insights: Market Profile" allows you to:
• Gain insight into the competitive landscape of the global Military IT, Data and Computing market.
• Provides detailed company profiles of leading Military IT, Data and Computing companies and related systems manufacturing companies across the world.
• Analyse the activity of key Military IT, Data and Computing companies, together with insights such as key alliances, strategic initiatives, and a brief financial analysis.
List Of Content
1 Introduction
1.1 What is this Report About?
1.2 Definitions
1.3 Summary Methodology
1.4 About Strategic Defence Intelligence (www.strategicdefenceintelligence.com)
2 Competitive Landscape and Strategic Insights
2.1 Competitive Landscape overview
2.1.1 ITT Exelis: Overview
2.1.2 ITT Exelis: Products and Services
2.1.3 ITT Exelis: Alliances
2.1.4 ITT Exelis: Recent Contract Wins
2.1.5 ITT Exelis: Financial Analysis
2.1.6 Raytheon: Overview
2.1.7 Raytheon: Products and Services
2.1.8 Raytheon: Alliances
2.1.9 Raytheon: Recent Contract Wins
2.1.10 Raytheon: Financial Analysis
2.1.11 Booz Allen Hamilton: Overview
2.1.12 Booz Allen Hamilton: Products and services
2.1.13 Booz Allen Hamilton: Alliances
2.1.14 Booz Allen Hamilton: Recent contract wins
2.1.15 Booz Allen Hamilton: Financial analysis
2.1.16 Presagis: Overview
2.1.17 Presagis: Products and Services
2.1.18 Presagis: Alliances
2.1.19 Presagis: Recent Contract Wins
2.1.20 Elbit Systems: Overview
2.1.21 Elbit Systems: Products and services
2.1.22 Elbit Systems: Alliances
2.1.23 Elbit Systems: Recent contract wins
2.1.24 Elbit Systems: Financial analysis
2.1.25 Thales: Overview
2.1.26 Thales: Products and services
2.1.27 Thales: Alliances
2.1.28 Thales: Recent contract wins
2.1.29 Thales: Financial analysis
2.1.30 Lockheed Martin: Overview
2.1.31 Lockheed Martin: Products and Services
2.1.32 Lockheed Martin: Alliances
2.1.33 Lockheed Martin: Recent Contract Wins
2.1.34 Lockheed Martin: Financial Analysis
2.1.35 Northrop Grumman: Overview
2.1.36 Northrop Grumman: Products and Services
2.1.37 Northrop Grumman: Recent Contract Wins
2.1.38 Northrop Grumman: Financial Analysis
2.1.39 BAE Systems: Overview
2.1.40 BAE Systems: Products and Services
2.1.41 BAE Systems: Alliances
2.1.42 BAE Systems: Recent Contract Wins
2.1.43 BAE Systems: Financial Analysis
2.1.44 DRS Tactical Systems: Overview
2.1.45 DRS Tactical Systems: Products and Services
2.1.46 DRS Tactical Systems: Recent Contract Wins
2.1.47 SAIC: Overview
2.1.48 SAIC: Products and Services
2.1.49 SAIC: Recent Contract Wins
2.1.50 SAIC: Financial Analysis
2.1.51 Microsoft: Overview
2.1.52 Microsoft: Products and Services
2.1.53 Microsoft: Alliances
2.1.54 Microsoft: Recent Contract Wins
2.1.55 Microsoft: Financial Analysis
2.1.56 General Dynamics: Overview
2.1.57 General Dynamics: Products and Services
2.1.58 General Dynamics: Alliances
2.1.59 General Dynamics: Recent Contract Wins
2.1.60 General Dynamics: Financial Analysis
2.1.61 Hewlett Packard: Overview
2.1.62 Hewlett Packard: Products and Services
2.1.63 Hewlett Packard: Alliances
2.1.64 Hewlett Packard: Recent Contract Wins
2.1.65 Hewlett Packard: Financial Analysis
3 Appendix
3.1 Methodology
3.2 Contact us
3.3 About SDI
3.4 Disclaimer
List Of Table
Table 1: Key Global Military IT, Data and Computing Manufacturers and Capabilities
Table 2: ITT Exelis – Alliances
Table 3: ITT Exelis – Recent Contract Wins
Table 4: Raytheon – Alliances
Table 5: Raytheon – Recent Contract Wins
Table 6: Booz Allen Hamilton: Alliances
Table 7: Booz Allen Hamilton: Recent Contract Wins
Table 8: Presagis – Alliances
Table 9: Presagis – Recent Contract Wins
Table 10: Elbit Systems – Alliances
Table 11: Elbit Systems – Recent Contract Wins
Table 12: Thales – Alliances
Table 13: Thales – Recent Contract Wins
Table 14: Lockheed Martin – Alliances
Table 15: Lockheed Martin – Recent Contract Wins
Table 16: Northrop Grumman – Recent Contract Wins
Table 17: BAE Systems – Alliances
Table 18: BAE Systems – Recent Contract Wins
Table 19: DRS Tactical Systems – Recent Contract Wins
Table 20: SAIC – Recent Contract Wins
Table 21: Microsoft – Recent Contract Wins
Table 22: General Dynamics – Alliances
Table 23: General Dynamics – Recent Contract Wins
Table 24: Hewlett Packard – Recent Contract Wins
List Of Figures
Figure 1: ITT Exelis – Revenue Trend Analysis (US$ Billion), 2009–2011
Figure 2: ITT Exelis – Operating Profit (US$ Million), 2009–2011
Figure 3: ITT Exelis – Net Profit Trend Analysis (US$ Million), 2009–2011
Figure 4: Raytheon – Revenue Trend Analysis (US$ Billion), 2007–2011
Figure 5: Raytheon – Operating Profit (US$ Million), 2007–2011
Figure 6: Raytheon – Net Profit Trend Analysis (US$ Million), 2007–2011
Figure 7: Booz Allen Hamilton – Revenue Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2009–2011
Figure 8: Booz Allen Hamilton – Operating Profit (US$ million), 2009–2011
Figure 9: Booz Allen Hamilton – Net Profit Trend Analysis(US$ million), 2009–2011
Figure 10: Elbit Systems – Revenue Trend Analysis (US$ Billion), 2006–2010
Figure 11: Elbit Systems – Operating Profit (US$ Million), 2006–2010
Figure 12: Elbit Systems – Net Profit Trend Analysis (US$ Million), 2006–2010
Figure 13: Thales – Revenue Trend Analysis (US$ Billion), 2007–2011
Figure 14: Thales – Operating Profit (US$ Million), 2007–2011
Figure 15: Lockheed Martin – Revenue Trend Analysis (US$ Billion), 2007–2011
Figure 16: Lockheed Martin – Operating Profit (US$ Billion), 2007–2011
Figure 17: Lockheed Martin – Net Profit Trend Analysis (US$ Billion), 2007–2011
Figure 18: Northrop Grumman – Revenue Trend Analysis (US$ Billion), 2007–2011
Figure 19: Northrop Grumman – Operating Profit (US$ Million), 2007–2011
Figure 20: Northrop Grumman – Net Profit Trend Analysis (US$ Million), 2007–2011
Figure 21: BAE Systems – Revenue Trend Analysis (GBP Billion), 2007–2011
Figure 22: BAE Systems – Operating Profit (GBP Million), 2007–2011
Figure 23: BAE Systems – Net Profit Trend Analysis (GBP Million), 200–2011
Figure 24: SAIC – Revenue Trend Analysis (US$ Billion), 2008–2012
Figure 25: SAIC – Operating Profit (US$ Million), 2008–2012
Figure 26: SAIC – Net Profit Trend Analysis (US$ Million), 2008–2012
Figure 27: Microsoft – Revenue Trend Analysis (US$ Billion), 2008–2012
Figure 28: Microsoft – Operating Profit (US$ Billion), 2008–2012
Figure 29: Microsoft – Net Profit Trend Analysis (US$ Billion), 2008–2012
Figure 30: General Dynamics – Revenue Trend Analysis (US$ Billion), 2007–2011
Figure 31: General Dynamics – Operating Profit (US$ Billion), 2007–2011
Figure 32: General Dynamics – Net Profit Trend Analysis (US$ Billion), 2007–2011
Figure 33: Hewlett Packard – Revenue Trend Analysis (US$ Billion), 2007–2011
Figure 34: Hewlett Packard – Operating Profit (US$ Billion), 2007–2011
Figure 35: Hewlett Packard – Net Profit Trend Analysis (US$ Billion), 2007–2011
